- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jayjg (talk) 02:24, 7 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Apphone (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A neoligism too far. Google appears to show results for this word, but the results list is not about the topic, except for the website of a chinese company. Adequately covered under smartphone, but I am not suggesting a redirect, or I'd have done that myself. Fiddle Faddle (talk) 13:10, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete minor neologism ~YellowFives 14:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 19:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.