Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apprentice (game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. — CharlotteWebb 21:09, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable. Original research. No reliable sources to support importance. Fails WP:SOFTWARE. Andre (talk) 21:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Disagree, keep, I have just added 8 references for notability, and so it now meets WP:SOFTWARE. --Amaccormack 09:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. If a silly internet meme (or something like Potter Puppet Pals) can have its own page, why not something useful like Apprentice?--Wormsie 16:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep a multiple AGS Award winner [1] 195.114.94.194 23:32, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Whilst the Bona Fide Games link looks ropey to me, the combination of other materials located by Amaccormack looks good and I believe establish notability. The article can be strengthened by adding details and references to Apprentice 2 in the future - the review sites coming to light in these AFDs can be used to reference a variety of indy games. Now that they're linked to from the article, a seed has been planted and the articles should grow. QuagmireDog 00:43, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.