Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arbitrary

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep as nomination is withdrawn. - Mailer Diablo 14:51, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

dictdef KeepKappa's edit Dlyons493 Talk 13:16, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Already in Wiktionary. Owen× ☎ 13:18, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Change to Keep following Kappa's edit. Owen× ☎ 18:25, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Could possibly have speedily deleted? - Magnus Holmgren 13:40, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Randomly select some method of disposition.  BD2412 ^talk 14:23, 29 October 2005 (UTC)
• Comment: I've replace the definition with a {{wi}} tag. There are a lot of inbound links to this thing [1], so I think randomly disposing of it might not be appropriate. Kappa 17:04, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• This is an appropriate method of disposal. Keep in this form. - Mike Rosoft 17:42, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Kappa's rewrite. Well done to him for the rewrite. Capitalistroadster 23:19, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• from the talk page: "Hi, this is basejumper123 and this article can be deleted. I wrote it to fill a non-functional link, but it really should be in wiktionary" ... I also suggest deletion.  ALKIVAR™ 23:51, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.