- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 14:44, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Arbnesh (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack of evidence of notability per WP:N FunkyCanute (talk) 15:27, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Montenegro-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:48, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Simply because I cannot find any evidence that this town exists. The article gives very little information, so it is hard to work out what Arbnesh is supposed to be (a town, a region in a town, etc). If it turns out to exist and is a town (rather than a region), I would lean on the side of keeping the article, because a town is likely to be notable regardless of sources (and, being Montenegro, it is unlikely that we'll find enough English sources). ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 20:12, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]- Keep According to Montenegran census data available here, there is a settlement in Bar called Arbnež; Arbnesh is probably a variant spelling or an anglicization of the ž. "Arbnež" turns up a lot more sources, and the article should probably be moved there, but it appears to be a verifiable settlement, which are considered notable. TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 23:00, 27 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and move to Arbnež - Looks like an actual settlement to me.[1]--Oakshade (talk) 00:41, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to Arbnež - ž is usually transcribed as zh not sh but that is no reason to delete. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 07:15, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - The source provided by TheCatalyst31 has allayed my worries. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 19:12, 31 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.