Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archie MacPhee

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:50, 26 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Archie MacPhee

Archie MacPhee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NFOOTBALL as a footballer that has not played in any WP:FPL, and the footballer also fails WP:GNG. Qed237 (talk) 19:34, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Qed237 (talk) 19:35, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Like the other players of Elgin City he fails the criteria of WP:NFOOTBALL too, as the club only plays in a minor league. The same is for the other club he saw action with. He also fails WP:GNG due to a lack of significant and substantial coverage of him in RS. He only gets mentioned in passing in local news media in after match reports. Apart from that there is nothing on him which would satisfy our notability guidelines. The article should therefore be deleted. Dead Mary (talk) 20:11, 18 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL. GiantSnowman 07:06, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:05, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 04:05, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Fails NFOOTY as has not played senior international football nor played in a fully professional league. No indication that subject has garnered significant reliable coverage for any other achievements to satisfy GNG. Fenix down (talk) 08:27, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.