Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Architecture of participation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was snow delete. I don't do this often, so here it goes: Out of the two references, one is a self-reference and one is a blog. Reads like an essay, a neologism, original research, unnotable, and lacks verifiability. Definitely no chance in hell that this will be kept. Sr13 07:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Architecture of participation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Neologism, original research, more Web 2.0-related crap. --- RockMFR 01:11, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete Really takes the piss, the only reference doesnt even put the words together jokingly. I feel sorry for the English Language, this decade has not been kind to her. -- Jimmi Hugh 01:27, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete - I feel so sorry for my old friend English. Oh well-Nonsense is as nonsense does. --tennisman 01:41, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 05:54, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete per WP:NEO, WP:OR, etc. east.718 07:03, 24 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.