Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Archives for UFO Research
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Stifle (talk) 11:22, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Archives for UFO Research (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Fails WP:ORG. No significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 16:57, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 13:04, 24 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep, it's a notable international UFO organization. Research items belonging to Kenny Young (Ufologist) were donated there by OHMUFON, for example. Go find the "multiple sources" yourself instead of nominating for deletion, I shouldn't have to defend every single article I volunteer to research and write for WikiProject Paranormal. If you have a problem with Wikipedia covering the paranormal, take it up elsewhere. SeanFromIT (talk) 20:27, 25 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- If it is notable, then provide multiple reliable sources in which the topic has significant coverage. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 04:19, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment/Keep per conditions It seems this may be notable enough if the size of their library is correct. Sean, could you find us some sources about it? I think this may be worth keeping. --mboverload@ 06:47, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No indication of notability by significant (or any) coverage in independent, reliable sources. Oh, and Sean, the burden of proof is on the editor arguing for inclusion. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 09:42, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete of the 140 or so unique Google hits I did not spot anything that would function as a credible independent reliable source establishing notability Guy (Help!) 13:06, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Question Would the closing admin mind userfying this to my space? Thanks! rootology (T) 13:51, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.