Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arnold the Palm Tree

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Fuhghettaboutit 01:47, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Arnold the Palm Tree

I can find absolutely nothing else about this character. While the claims may be true, this article faces a serious verifiability problem - and a likely notability one too. The Evil Spartan 21:32, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as nonsense. Delete as hoax. "Arnold the palm tree" gets ONE Ghit, and that's this page, oddly enough. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?)} 21:38, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Sorry, but I'm afraid it's not nonsense. It may be a fraud, or a hoax, but it's at least coherent enough to be a bit more than nonsense. FrozenPurpleCube 21:41, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'd love to speedy it myself but some folks are demanding A7 be hyperstrictly applied. Also, MM makes a decent point about nonsense. But the article needs to go.--JodyB_{yak, yak, yak} 21:43, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as I can't find any evidence that any such cartoon ever existed. Nor any for the purported creator, Sid Fortunes. FrozenPurpleCube 21:50, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, nothing found in Google Books or Google News Archive, fails WP:V. Ridiculous hoaxes, however silly or obvious, don't fall under the nonsense rule, for good reason. --Dhartung | Talk 21:57, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:V - put simply if nothing can be found on it then it's obviously not verifiable.--daniel folsom 22:07, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Smells like a Hoax and if not looks very nn. The only page is redirected to a Wikipedia bot sub-page.--JForget 22:51, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unsourced and possibly WP:MADEUP. Dbromage [Talk] 23:28, 26 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This has "hoax" painted all over it. Not even on IMDB. Spellcast 09:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletions. -- the wub "?!" 14:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator, smells like SOMETHING, but I'm not sure that smell is a hoax. Burntsauce 21:48, 27 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.