Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arrowhawk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Yunshui ^雲_水 10:38, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Arrowhawk

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Arrowhawk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely un-notable fictional creature. There are no non-primary sources being used in the article, and I have found nothing significant showing any sort of real world notability upon searches. There are a handful of other things bearing the same name, such a a novel and a former hedge fund group, but they have no relation to this creature. Rorshacma (talk) 05:59, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 06:56, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 10:49, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or merge to List of Dungeons & Dragons 3rd edition monsters. BOZ (talk) 12:09, 23 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note that the proposed target for the merge is also being considered for deletion. Not a very active user (talk) 10:19, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Appears to be totally non-notable and a minor fictional animal._{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 14:40, 24 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - The character is not notable enough for its own page. — Kstone999 (talk) 13:49, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - article just doesn't seem to pass WP:GNG. Videogameplayer99 (talk) 02:43, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - Non-notable topic with no potential whatsoever. TTN (talk) 18:12, 29 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.