Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arsenal F.C. squad numbers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 23:34, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Arsenal F.C. squad numbers

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:NOT#STATS. This article, though it has a nice lede, contains no information of encyclopedic value. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/F.C. Barcelona squad numbers Sandman888 (talk) 15:57, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. — Luxic (talk) 16:21, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete; a step too far into non-encyclopaedic stats assembly. Any interesting features can be summarised in the main article. TerriersFan (talk) 21:35, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as article fails WP:NOTDIRECTORY and WP:LISTCRUFT. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 22:08, 21 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The content is nice, and obviously well-researched, but the topic is not exactly encyclopaedic. – Pee Jay 14:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:02, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:03, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:56, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge any prose not already included in Arsenal F.C. strip to that article, do not merge the big tables -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:03, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom and previous AfD. Giant Snowman 22:54, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Merge the prose (but not the table) to an article on the football club. Useful and decently sourced. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 03:44, 27 June 2010 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.