- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted (A1). (non-admin closure) —LedgendGamer 08:07, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Artgargoyle (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not meet specific criteria for A7, but unquestionably fails WP:N. —LedgendGamer 06:56, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Not notable. --Vejvančický (talk) 07:29, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:V. Deor (talk) 10:20, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 11:51, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete - G1, G3, A1 .... take your pick. I have tagged it A1 as it appears to match best, let's see. Enki H. (talk) 13:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Absolutely no point at all... Irunongames • play 13:23, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. I don't see that the article falls into G1, as it is fairly coherent, and G3 does not apply here either, aas I have no reason to believe it is a hoax, but those who drafted the A7 criterion could not possibly have foreseen something like this. -- Blanchardb -Me•MyEars•MyMouth- timed 14:14, 1 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.