Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artificial Agent

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:35, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Artificial Agent

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Aside from the fact that this article is currently in terrible typographical shape, which can be fixed, it is about a non-notable band with multiple non-reliable sources. Robert McClenon (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Article of an unnotable band in horrible shape. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DeviantAttitude (talk • contribs) 20:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:GNG and WP:BAND. Although not as horrible as before, still should be deleted.--DThomsen8 (talk) 23:54, 11 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 16:12, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there are some links here, but still nothing convincing of independent notability. SwisterTwister talk 22:36, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.