Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artificial Elite
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Fram (talk) 11:56, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Artificial Elite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Lack of notability
- Delete, notability is not established by the one self-published source. --Explodicle (talk) 20:17, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:35, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, this is a self-published source, and from a blog that itself may not pass a notability test. BananaFiend (talk) 12:14, 25 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Against Deletion: This article is on a piece of work which was posted on a source not owned by the writer and, is a summary of that. I fail to see how this vague term of 'notability' is relevant, I suggest those users with issues on this article re-read Wikipedia's deletion policies, specifically those on stubs.
- User:125.238.255.174, I suggest you create a user account, add your signature with a timestamp to your comments, and read the Wikipedia:Notability project page. --Loremaster (talk) 10:42, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I just re-read the deletion policy and notability is right there. --Explodicle (talk) 23:31, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - article says this was a "phrase coined in a blog" last year. Good, so it's a neologism - anything more? If this is nothing more than a phrase someone made up one day, then it fails. AllGloryToTheHypnotoad (talk) 19:45, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Against Deletion - That is inaccurate. The blog was only the host for the article written. The person who wrote the article and the blog owner are different people. The reason the blog is referenced is because that it is currently the only source (as far as I'm aware) that hosts Purdon's article on the internet.
- It doesn't matter and, as I said earlier, in order for your vote to be taken into account, please create a user account, add your signature with a timestamp to your comments, and read the Wikipedia:Notability project page. By the way, you can only vote once. So stop acting like a teenage bully. --Loremaster (talk) 10:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Against Deletion - That is inaccurate. The blog was only the host for the article written. The person who wrote the article and the blog owner are different people. The reason the blog is referenced is because that it is currently the only source (as far as I'm aware) that hosts Purdon's article on the internet.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.