Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Artificial Intuition

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was already deleted. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:23, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Artificial Intuition

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Blatant neologism. One source, which is an SPS. One sentence. [Belinrahs|^talktome⁄ _ididit] 18:05, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. NBeale (talk) 18:44, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per WP:NEO. Joe Chill (talk) 21:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know if I have a say because I haven't been involved in this article, but I understand the underlying stuff, because of profession. I would recommend delete per WP:N and WP:NEO. I have now read the home page artificial-intuition.com in order to understand what Artificial Intuition might be, and it simply doesn't describe what it is. It is a WP:NEO without any meaning, except an imagined alternative to Artificial Intelligence, and the site is a private research org. Any google hits will most likely get pages that links to that private research org. If it once upon a time explains what Artificial Intuition is, f.ex. a fuzzy-based heuristic system directed towards fast execution of effectors based on sensor input (a typical AI application), then it might be recreated in that hypothetical future. ... said: Rursus (^mbork³) 17:09, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rursus--you should always to feel free to participate in deletion discussion even if you haven't been involved in an article. I would guess that it the typical case (though some of us try to fix it up once we see an article at AfD). Thanks for contributing.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:31, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.