- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 23:49, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Neologism and apparent advertisement or endorsement Skysmith 07:48, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam. I was very interested to see in the article history a number of editors disagreeing over the best way to get rid of this article. Anyway, it's had since last year to blossom into something encyclopedic and it never happened. Someguy1221 09:26, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Spam and nonsense, the cornerstones of a non-nutritious meal. tomasz. 13:33, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: protologism, advertising. -- Karada 23:15, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This is an add, not an article. The definition given is way too vague to improve this article. Everything that is created is in some way inspired by some kind of artistic work. Malc82 23:30, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete If I understand it, it is some sort of spam ... if I don't understand it, it's nonsense. I haven't decided if I understand it or not. But delete either way. HeirloomGardener 03:37, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as neologism. JJL 03:02, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.