Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asghar adam ali(Al Attar)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Salting may be requested at WP:RFPP, I am not familiar with the history to know whether it's warranted. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:39, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Asghar adam ali(Al Attar) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity page, been deleted several times before. I didn't like the format of the title so attempted to move/requested a move and discovered why it's blocked. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asghar_Adam_Ali fair to say it is a COI page brought in sneakily by the backdoor. It does have some references, however most are from two linked publications (linked to each other e.g. how guardian/observer are), circulation on one is pretty low, i can't tell whether it justified significant coverage in a viable publication, hence putting it up for vote. Also don't know how to access deletion discussion for previous article (or was it speedy'd?) to see prior consensus.

  • would also like someone to consider whether Nabeel Perfumes is a candidate. To me it seems as though it's a poorly sourced, not very notable company created for promotional purposes buy an SPA/COI, however sometimes when this has been the case, I have taken a more brutal view on GNG than others and it's been voted K. Don't want to waste time with an unnecessary AfD unless it's justified.

Rayman60 (talk) 14:55, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:47, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.