- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:56, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Askeet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
can't find any relevant coverage - tagged for notability since november 2009 nonsense ferret 19:02, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:24, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - software article lacking 3rd party references to establish notability; created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 13:39, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 11:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom - David Gerard (talk) 11:55, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.