- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Uncontested, agreement that the subject does not meet WP:GNG. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 05:08, 17 June 2016 (UTC)
- Aslam Azad (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete. Fails GNG. Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 07:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I can't find any significant coverage in reliable sources to meet WP:GNG. He doesn't appear to meet the notability criteria as a poet or journalist either. If the article is kept it would need a substantial rewrite to clean up the poorly written English and remove all the puffery and trivial content. Sarahj2107 (talk) 08:51, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable in all his various capacities. I have to admit it is so badly written trying to read it gave me a headache.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Fails to meet requirements of wp:gng. Search for significant coverage in reliable sources results in negative findings. B E C K Y S A Y L E S 22:40, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.