Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspect Consulting (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was blasted into chunky kibbles. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 12:18, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aspect Consulting

AfDs for this article:

• Articles for deletion/Aspect Consulting
• Articles for deletion/Aspect Consulting (2nd nomination)

Aspect Consulting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization lacking in-depth, non-trivial support. reddogsix (talk) 22:23, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 22:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 22:34, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - even if one were inclined to try and untangle all the mind games and contradictory edits of the author and their sock puppets at its core the topic remains a PR setup claiming some WP:INHERITed notability from its dodgy clients. Cabayi (talk) 22:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - to second comments above, this is a minor PR setup claiming WP:INHERITed notoriety through a few dodgy clients (or a competitor claiming the company has that notoriety for the same reason - either way, it's nuts). What's more, there seem to be WP:NPOV issues that nobody seems willing to sort out. Organiccovfefe (talk) 09:29, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

— Organiccovfefe (talk · contribs) has only contributed to the article(s) under discussion for deletion and AFD. Cabayi (talk) 11:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC), possibly a sock of the author Cabayi (talk) 11:31, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.