Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspect Maintenance

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 17:22, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Aspect Maintenance (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Won an award but does not appear to be notable. Philafrenzy (talk) 22:58, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:10, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy delete as patent nonsense. This calls itself a property maintenance and refurbishment company operating across the domestic and commercial sectors. The incidental mention in the only source that looks independent[1] suggests that what they actually do is plumbing. This is borderline vandalism. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 20:26, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm guessing you won't be too impressed with the other two articles started by the editor who created this one, either.--Epeefleche (talk) 09:51, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. No evidence of encyclopedic notability.--Michig (talk) 09:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Does not meet our notability requirements.--Epeefleche (talk) 09:46, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.