Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asperger's self-identification
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 01:58, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
WP:NOT a how-to guide or the mayo clinic, besides if you really wanted to identify yourself you have more than enough information to do it from the featured articles on the subjects here. One could also speculate that the article was created to promote the "Aspie-quiz", by the author. We don't have any articles like this for other conditions (i.e. Downs syndrome self-indentification) and it may not be a precedent one would want. I don't really think there is anything worth merging to Asperger syndrome, so I'll say Delete (for the record someone else did put a merge tag on the article but it was removed by the author). WhiteNight T | @ | C 20:54, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak delete per nominator. Barno 21:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as not encyclopedia material. Edgar181 21:40, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. PJM 21:51, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki if anywhere is appropriate; Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-11 22:37Z
- Weak delete per nominator. (Agree especially that the implications that the article exists to promote the Aspie-Quiz are troublesome.) -- ManekiNeko | Talk 22:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Promo effort for the aspie-quiz, mostly, but moreover Wikipedia is not a how-to guide. Stifle 16:34, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.