Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ass Parade

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Deleted by Xezbeth with summary of (linkspam). -- JLaTondre 04:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising. Pure and simple.➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 17:54, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Per nom. --lightdarkness ^(talk) 17:54, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Good for a chuckle, but delete per nom.Bjones 17:56, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. -- Win777 17:58, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Should also include Assparade and AssParade. Tagging them to this AfD now. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 18:00, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as to all three. --Fuhghettaboutit 18:07, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as everyone above, totally ad. They even had a price at the bottom!  :-) --Deville (Talk) 18:18, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. ¡Dustimagic! ^(T/C) 00:22, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 04:32, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete um... why wasn't this prodded? Sparsefarce 06:41, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment Because I suspected that the person who posted these articles would like as not remove the prod tags. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 12:02, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all as embarassing adcruft. Deizio 16:23, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, blatant advertising. Dpbsmith (talk) 21:38, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.