Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asset voting (2nd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 04:38, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
AfDs for this article:
- Asset voting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Delete. non-notable. neologism. original research. article created by a banned user (Sarsaparilla). Cordyceps2009 (talk) 11:01, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, and because the sources simply don't check out. Appears to be WP:OR Chzz ► 21:12, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- If a good target can be found Merge otherwise Delete this orphan article. -- allen四names 15:51, 20 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.