- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy deleted per WP:CSD#G1 by Acroterion (talk · contribs). Non-admin closure. --Dhartung | Talk 06:00, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This may well go the way of the last nn neologism I sent to afd. Delete, non-notable neologism. I get 14 Unique Google hits, so I think it's not in common usage. Dlohcierekim 03:17, 12 December 2007 (UTC) Dlohcierekim 03:17, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh for the love of He who is noodly in appearance! Delete, move to someone's BJAODN. J-ſtanTalkContribs 03:27, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I was thinking Uncyclopedia. Dlohcierekim 04:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.