Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asyraf Awang Besar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete, speedily. Gwen Gale (talk) 05:32, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Asyraf Awang Besar

Delete not notable, mostly WP:MADEUP or WP:HOAX Mayalld (talk) 12:50, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete obvious hoax. All sources are facebook, but made to appear as NYT or MSN or Billboard. Suggest snowball close and block of this editor for socking, vandalism (removing AFD tag), and hoaxes. NJGW (talk) 16:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note I see this has been deleted before on December 30, 2008. May need to salt. NJGW (talk) 16:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Calling for a snowball close is premature (only two of us have commented). This AFD should run its course, not least because a full AfD process ensures that further infractions are easier to deal with (which is why I removed your speedy). Likewise, talk of punitive blosks is premature. The editor has been warned. He will either heed the warnings, and become a productive editor or he won't, and will be blocked. Rushing to a block before giving an opprtunity to behave isn't necessary. Mayalld (talk) 16:37, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, but you're the one that called him tendentious. I assumed you meant that this behaviour had been going on for a while, so the socking seemed blatant. NJGW (talk) 17:00, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

He has done a fair bit of silly creation in two "slots" over the past two weeks, and has now been warned. If he continues, he will end up blocked. The fact that this is going AfD rather than speedy will mean that it is a more powerful argument that he ought to KNOW that he is out of order. Mayalld (talk) 17:10, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: no trace of notability (no independent sources discussing the subject). Wikipedia is not a place for people to publish their bios. Facebook is. Aymatth2 (talk) 17:38, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brunei-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 21:35, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:03, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Restored the Afd notice again. Edward321 (talk) 01:38, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have restored the Afd notice once again after an IP vandal removed it (obviously the creator or a meat puppet). This childishness has gone on far too long. I removed the falsified sources which point only to facebook, and reissued the Speedy request. If this behavior is all this editor can give us, then a speedy will send a better message than this drawn out process. NJGW (talk) 05:20, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.