Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AtYourGate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:43, 27 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AtYourGate

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

trivial company, minor pr-based articles in local newspapers (and on Fox). For what it's worth, I do not see how it can be called a robot: it doesn't guide itself--it follows a human, just carrying the food DGG ( talk ) 11:15, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, and California. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 11:26, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. GoldMiner24 ^Talk 11:31, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete AtYourGate. This startup company does not satisfy general notability or corporate notability. An article should speak for itself, and this article only says that the company exists. We knew that.
- Article has been moved to draft space twice, by User:Onel5969 and User:DGG, and moved back to article space both times by originator. The second move back to article space had the silly edit summary: "Article meets WP:NCORP and is still in active development." The place for a page that is in active development is draft space.
- The references are interviews about the service at four airports in the United States. They demonstrate that the company provides service at various airports in the United States, but none of them are independent.

Reference Number	Reference	Comments	Independent	Significant	Reliable	Secondary
1	www.sandiegouniontribune.com	Interview with company about service in San Diego	No	Yes	Yes	No
2	www.seattletimes.com	Interview with company about service in Seattle	No	Yes	Yes	No
3	www.foxnews.com	Interview about service at Philadelphia airport	No	Yes	Yes	No
4	startribune.com	Interview about service at Minneapolis airport	No	Yes	Yes	No

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:20, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and due to editor's behavior, salt. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:22, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No historical value. Fails WP:NCORP. scope_creep^Talk 23:14, 20 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Fails WP:GNG and WP:NCORP. Cheers, The man from Gianyar (talk) 23:57, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I can’t find any relevant and independent press coverage to back up the notability of this company, a standard search brings up multiple pages of company owned links, like social media, their own website etc. GeekBurst (talk) 00:09, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Clearly a snow close at this point. No need to salt as I am the editor in question, with a talk page which has been open to your concerns all along if you have them. Retswerb (talk) 08:51, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails WP:GNG. Seems to have been created purely to promote the company. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 18:25, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a company/organization therefore NCORP guidelines apply. WP:NCORP requires multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. Interviews are not only PRIMARY sources but also not Independent Content. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and I can't find any, topic fails WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:59, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above delete voters. Misasory (talk) 21:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.