- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. — Aitias // discussion 01:11, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Atol (software) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I can't find any reliable sources that show notability. Fails WP:NOTABILITY. Schuym1 (talk) 22:27, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: I can't seem to find any common-sense coming from this article. South Bay (talk) 05:40, 4 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:17, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No notability indicated. Seems to fall under teh dicdef criteria for corporate articles ChildofMidnight (talk) 06:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 07:49, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.