Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attached Department

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 01:35, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Attached Department

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Attached Department (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:DICDEF of a generic term as used by the Punjab government. Similar to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Administrative department. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:01, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:48, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - nom is correct, doesn't seem more than a used term in a BEFORE check. Is a straight-forward example of DICDEF and doesn't contribute to Wikipedia. No evident redirect ___location. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:35, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom - obvious. Smallbones_(smalltalk) 11:07, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.