Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attention Everyone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WjBscribe 14:24, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Attention Everyone

Extremely minor character in Disney's "Robin Hood", who is onscreen for about 2 seconds and has the one line mentioned in the article. Not notable. NawlinWiki 20:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Also, there's no source for this character even having a name. He is listed in the IMDB entries for Robin Hood (1973 film) and Candy Candido as "Tournament Crocodile." NawlinWiki 20:04, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Too minor a character to merit its own article. Dr bab 20:54, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for being a good example of pointlessly non-notable waltdisneycruft. Eddie.willers 01:14, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete He can't be that minor a character if people feel the need to research him and make a page on him. Leave the page alone. It's not causing any harm. I'm not a member on Wikipedia, but i don't really see tne problem. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.132.38 (talk • contribs) — 77.99.132.38 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
- So your argument is "Someone made the page, so it shouldn't be deleted." That's awesome. -Branddobbe 10:13, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete His character is so funny, and he is infact throughout the whole film. That scene when he is run over is pure Disney magic. Leave this page for all us Disney fans! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.99.132.38 (talk • contribs) — 77.99.132.38 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Don't Delete Great film and great character. Woo that crocodile rocks! —The preceding unsigned comments were added by 77.99.132.38 (talk) 09:24, 9 April 2007 (UTC). — 77.99.132.38 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
Delete for the love of god you guys. This is why no one takes Wikipedia seriously. -Branddobbe 10:11, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Don't Delete He is still a character and just because he doesn't speak alot doesn't mean he isn't in the film. He is in quite abit. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.201.141.66 (talk • contribs) (only edits are to this AFD)
Don't DeleteI don't actually understand what the harm in having this character is. He's not affecting anyone so why delete him? Plus as an encyclopedia, the information needed about him is there to be looked up. For someone to make a page on him and for a discussion to be created about him, it must mean that people are interested in him. So i feel that this page should not be deleted.(Suzyyyyy 18:08, 9 April 2007 (UTC)) — Suzyyyyy (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
- I could understand these arguments if the character was a constant mainstay in the movies, but he's in one movie for two seconds with no impact on anything. Having an article on him is equivalent to having an article about every waiter in every movie ever made. It is totally unnecessary. -Branddobbe 23:55, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
delete. . Mukadderat 17:53, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.