Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atypical, adjuvant and potentiators
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. v/r - TP 00:48, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Atypical, adjuvant and potentiators (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unreferenced. My attempts to search for reliable sources on this have just found material sourced from this article in the copies-of-Wikipedia echo chamber. Without verifiable reliable sources to back it up, this article fails to meet the WP:V and WP:RS criteria for inclusion. The Anome (talk) 12:59, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 16:32, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Catchall category of drugs, poorly named, which does not seem to have any validity as a notable class of drugs - based on searching. --MelanieN (talk) 15:04, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete nothing in gnews to show these words being used together. Fails WP:GNG. Possibly original research. LibStar (talk) 14:32, 17 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.