Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Audit methodology for Sustainable Transport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 11:30, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure we could write an article on audit methodology for sustainable transport, but this would not be it. References to blogspot etc., and no actual substance (this is more like a meta-article describing what an article would include). The (here) link to TRL will probably never be filled since it's copyright, I usually pay around £25 for TRL reports. As far as I can see this is an attempt to create a Wiki version of a single TRL report. This was speedied at Town Traffic Test, but the creator seems intent and recreated it both there and here so let's see if it's just me who thinks this is a problem. Guy 08:44, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as above. The article is virtually content free and vaguely POV but mainly original research-tastic. OBM | ^{blah blah blah} 09:05, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and definitely as being basically content free! Nigel ^(Talk) 12:04, 29 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.