- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. No prejudice against re-creation if notability is established. Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:23, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Auguri (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Was recreated after speedy deletion, but I do not believe the speedy criterion applies here. Non-notable software. Delete. Blanchardb-Me•MyEars•MyMouth-timed 14:09, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Why Delete?Was so notable of other software? Auguri is one of the few software packages that allows nonlinear analysis and local forecasting methods in phase-space, as well as strange attractor animation in 4-Ds-- That's notable. I see commercial software listed here. That the article needs rewriting may be true. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kiskkeya (talk • contribs) 17:53, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete brochure-style list of features in a non-notable software program. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:42, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no sources, no notability. If sources were found, it'd still have to be rewritten completely. Huon (talk) 15:06, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete notability concerns Edeskonline (talk) 15:49, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no sources, no notability. --Killerofcruft (talk) 16:26, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp | talk to me 23:46, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.