Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Augusta Exchange (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 04:16, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Augusta Exchange

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A 50 store shopping center. No claim to notability. A case of WP:MILL. Searching turns up lots of hits like movie listing, passing mentions like "restaurant x" is opening at Augusta Exchange. Don't see anything that would establish notability. Was kept at 2008 AFD, but that really didn't substantiate notability. The article is still primarily a list of stores. MB 04:11, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Shopping malls-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per previous AFD comments and decision. It is covered by multiple media, including this WJBF news report in January 2017. There are sources. Notability is not temporary. This one has been covered at AFD before. --do ncr am 22:29, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Coverage has to be in-depth to establish notability. Passing mentions and routine coverage are not sufficient. The example you gave just says two new restaurants are coming to this shopping center. This is routine local coverage that would be expected in local media for any shopping center. MB 01:55, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. WP:MILL. Malls less than 100,000m3 aren't automatically notable unless they are accompanied by strong secondary sources. Routine coverage at local level only - news about new restaurants opening isn't sufficient enough. An extensive search online finds nothing other than routine coverage. Ajf773 (talk) 04:47, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
delete run of the mill coverage. Not seeing indepth coverage to meet WP:GNG. LibStar (talk) 12:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.