Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurora Borealis (MCD)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Einherjer#Discography. Redirecting as an editorial decision. Consider this a no consensus close. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aurora Borealis (MCD) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Demos are assumed non-notable per WP:MUSIC. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 18:22, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:58, 20 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
• All I see in WP:MUSIC regarding demos is that unreleased material is usually not notable. This recording was later given wide commercial release. This is a useful stub. ×Meegs 19:37, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

• Procedural Comment - the EP started as a demo but later became an album, so the "assumed non-notable" argument from the nominator is illegitimate. This AfD could possibly be closed as "moot" for that very reason. Meanwhile, if someone thinks this album article should be deleted, then a proper nomination should be conducted with distinct arguments about notability or the lack thereof. With all that being said, the EP does not appear to have received significant coverage beyond discography sites and file-sharing sites, so the article could maybe be deleted for that reason. If someone did a proper nomination. --DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 02:46, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.