Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aurora Perrineau

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This probably will pass criteria eventually, but I just can't see a consensus for keeping it today. Dennis Brown | 2¢ | WER 02:04, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Aurora Perrineau

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

per WP:CRYSTAL and WP:TOOSOON. She has only one notable film role, which is currently shooting and in other film she has just been added to the cast. Which does not make her notable. Captain Assassin! ^{«T ♦ C ♦ G»} 03:49, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 07:47, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is clearly an example of someone who is not yet notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:57, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - "She is best known for her upcoming starring role..." --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 21:16, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:52, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - She is "best known for" something that virtually no one knows anything about? Wow, quite the trick. Fails WP:ENT and WP:GNG. - SummerPhD (talk) 00:15, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I am in favor of keeping a page for the upcoming actress. The pivotal role Aurora will play in the Jem and the Holograms movie will satisfy WP:ENT. Silver Buizel (talk)

You are the creator of the article, right? So you have the crystal ball. Tell me what will happen: Will I be pretty, will I be rich? Will this article be deleted? How can you know beforehand who will be notable in the future? --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 18:55, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That he feels that the role will bring more coverage is fine, but he should have stuck with existing film roles and existing coverage. There is no need to belittle him. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 10:17, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep per WP:ENT and WP:GNG just giving us a pass of WP:BIO. A predictive that WP:ENT will be satisfied in the future is not a proper rationale for a keep. However, arguing that it is already met is a valid rationale: Career beginning with a named role in one episode of Pretty Little Liars, and moving to a named role in Air Collision, a named role in A House is Not a Home, and a named role in Jem and the Holograms (a film which has been heard of), gives us the "significant roles in multiple notable..." as indicated by WP:ENT. Add this growing career to coverage and photos of this youngster in such as Hollywood Reporter, Madame Noire, Clutch, Indiewire, Black Girl Nerd, Just Jared, Deadline, Up and Comers, The Rooot, and Netjoven (Spanish), and a mention in People, Racked, Metro, and Entertainment Weekly, gives us WP:GNG. A suitable alternative to a flat-out deletion might have been to suggest this sourcable information could have found a home within the articles on her parents Harold Perrineau and Brittany Perrineau, but it increases a reader's understanding to have this article remain and grow further over time and through regular editing. The article author would be well advised to use the additional found sources to cite facts within the article, lest it be returned to AFD by someone who feels only the biggest of film stars can be written of here. Disclosure: User:Silver Buizel dropped me a neutral note inviting me here to offer my input. I did my WP:BEFORE before reaching my conclusions. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 18:04, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 18:45, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:TOOSOON Fails WP:GNG fails WP:ENT. --Bejnar (talk) 06:38, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.