- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 21:46, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
- Authena (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 03:04, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
Delete — Per nom. Only about 7000 hits on google. Btilm 22:40, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | Talk 01:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
- Delete. Only about 405 hits on google. Also, most of those are glitches in Google's digitizing system, or women who happened to be named Authena. Abductive (reasoning) 10:23, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, obvious advertising, as well as obviously opinionated original research: It is conjectured that Authena's open design and empowerment of the artist will make it more popular than traditional DRM schemes. Eventually, other DRM schemes will have to open up to compete. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:16, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.