Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Authentic source

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 17:49, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Neologism. While this is close to gibberish, underneath lays a vanity neologism - in searching around I can't find any cites for the phrase used in this fashion. --moof 12:35, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a neologistic dicdef padded out with vanity, per nom. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] :: AfD? 17:35, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. → Ξxtreme Unction {^yakł_blah} 12:57, 17 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.