Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Authentics foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  08:34, 9 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Authentics foundation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Rather promotional, with no demonstrated notability. Given that there are references to a conference they held, it's not really a clear A7 or G11 DGG ( talk ) 23:31, 16 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:40, 18 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Should be renamed Authentics Foundation, but seems to meet the WP:GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. There's been a reasonable amount of coverage by Public Radio International, the BBC, Times of India, New York Times (op-ed, so take it for what it's worth) and some more. I'm not hugely impressed by the extent of the coverage, but I think it does meet the criteria. --Batard0 (talk) 05:25, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Gongshow ^Talk 07:16, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Significant coverage by reliable secondary sources, as has been provided above by Batard0. Meets the general notability guideline and the notability guideline for organisations.--xanchester (t) 09:20, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 00:17, 1 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.