- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 20:21, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- AutoCMS (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Was a speedy but IMO falls just outside the criteria and merits further discussion here The Uninvited Co., Inc. 19:49, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as the article does not establish notability (WP:NSOFT)--additionally, all links given are repositories wherein anyone can upload/submits programs...I was unable to find significant coverage in third-party sources. Theopolisme (talk) 23:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I can find nothing out there that would suggest this is particularly notable. It's a worthy project like much of Open Source, but nothing more. §FreeRangeFrogcroak 00:14, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:19, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete One man's idea of how to do CMS. Not a bad idea, but no indications that anyone has sat up and taken notice. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:14, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - unreferenced software article with no indication of notability; created by an SPA as possibly promotional. Dialectric (talk) 12:41, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.