Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auto summarize

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. The majority of the text was a direct copy and paste from another website (copyvio) and what remained left failed to assert the importance of the subject.. Rjd0060 (talk) 16:02, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Auto summarize (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable, unencyclopedic, not worthy of an article ukexpat (talk) 22:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete as a copyvio from http://www.slate.com/id/2419 -- Whpq (talk) 17:07, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. This MS Word program deserves a sentence in larger article on that family of technologies, but no more. —Noah 05:16, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.