Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autoconstruction (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 15:21, 17 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This might be a bit controversial, the last AfD having only concluded mere days ago, but that had no consensus, and I've since transwikied this. TheProject 03:47, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete this is obviously just a dictionary definition. I've never heard anyone use this term in this way and the Google hits seem to be mostly in French, but if Wiktionary wants it, that's cool. We don't need it. Opabinia regalis 04:00, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Dicdef. Has been transwikied so delete. --Srikeit ^{(Talk | Email)} 04:11, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete for reasons already stated. DVD+ R/W 04:15, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete dicdef (technically, if we follow the roots, this should mean a house that builds itself...or a person that builds itself...) Jammo (SM247) 05:24, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above: bare dicdef. Zetawoof^(ζ) 05:38, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom/Opabinia/Srikeit. Paddles ^T_C 09:56, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 20:09, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above Adambiswanger1 20:30, 12 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.