Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Autodesk Composite
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted by User:Nyttend under criterion G12 as a copyright infringement of this site. (Non-admin closure) "Pepper" @ 21:18, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Autodesk Composite (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Delete, appears to fail GNG. Search is coming up with [[1]] mostly just linking to their own website. SO basically an Advertisement in my opinion Hell In A Bucket (talk) 01:41, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete per A7 and G11, which is the notice I originally added. TBrandley (what's up) 01:44, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Software is specifically exempt from A7 and its' not promotional to the point of needing immediate removal. This is the appropriate venue for this particular article. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 02:03, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Tagged as possible copyvio - While visiting Autodesk's page for this product, I noticed the content was copied word for word. Although there wasn't a copyright tag, the main autodesk.com website does have one so I assume that extends to all (or almost all) pages. While searching with Google News, I found results for Autodesk Maya which contained Composite but I'm assuming this was a different but related product. However, I found a press release here for AutoDesk Composite and Google Books also found relevant results. Although I'm not an expert with this product, if a rewrite can't be done then I would suggest merging and redirecting to one of the Autodesk articles, possibly the main article Autodesk. For now, it's better to delete it as a possible copy violation. SwisterTwister talk 06:35, 2 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.