- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ItsZippy (talk • contributions) 15:40, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Autoingest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Initially, an IP editor tagged this article for deletion with no rationale. I removed it, asking them to provide reasons... but upon review, I realized that the entire article is advertisement copy. There are no sources provided, nor can I find anything that mentions this software beyond the publisher's website and mirrors of this article. The cost section offers quantity discounts. My concern is that, if I removed everything promotional, there would be nothing left. I'm happy to keep this with adequate sourcing, but I can find none. UltraExactZZ Said ~ Did 19:03, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete for the reasons mentioned in the nomination. --Kristjan Wager (talk) 19:21, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:44, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as promotion. I'm seeing a bare mention here, but a reasonable search doesn't find anything meeting IRS. BusterD (talk) 12:43, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.