Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automated Driver's License Test

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete vanity spam. Guy 11:05, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Automated Driver's License Test

Vanity; part of a walled garden on the work of Sandy Straus EngineerScotty 23:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete Delete ALL articles related as pure vanity. Wildthing61476 23:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Comment:See also AFDs for the following:

--EngineerScotty 00:06, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nomination, I wish people would stick to just creating their one line autobio vanity stub that can be speedy deleted on sight. Equendil Talk 00:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fqm6254 01:37, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
PLEASE do not delete this entry. It is not an autobio. It is not a vanity autobio snub. It is referenced by government publications. Please ignore EngineerScotty and Equendil. The are not qualified to make this determination and are not educated in the art germane to this information.
Comment. The comment above was moved by me to its current place, as it was added before nomination. Chronological order respected. Equendil Talk 01:38, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

' EngineerScotty, Equendil, and Wildthing61476 are retaliating against me User:NYer for earlier complaints I made against certain Wikipedia administrators. They are attempting to delete or get others to delete my entries. Please DO NOT delete this entry. Furthermore, they are not medical doctors or biomedical engineers and this information is cited by government sources. Thank you.NYer 01:40, 27 September 2006 (UTC)'[reply]

Comment Before you start tossing accusations around, I dont KNOW you. I don't think I've ever edited one of your articles, and quite honestly I don't pay attention to the author but rather the content. By the way, how dare you say I'm not qualified to state my honest determination of an article? When did you decide who's qualified to write on Wikipedia? Wildthing61476 01:53, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete with extreme prejudice, extreme vanity by someone attempting to disrupt Wikipedia for their own gain. User:Zoe|(talk) 01:57, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

****Please ignore User:Zoe who is exploiting his friendship with bulleys to retaliate and delete the work of others.

''''Wildthing61476, what is your problem? Is it this article or are you just angry because others are seeking to retaliate because I voiced concern about some administrators. It's rather unprofessional for anyone to act this way. Is this what Wikepedia is about? Angry administrators and the friends they gather to delete the work of others? That is the lowest denominator. And it is certainly not an excuse to delete the work of others.NYer 02:03, 27 September 2006 (UTC)''''[reply]

Comment Number one, don't lump me in with ANYONE else. This is a referendum when everyone's voice is heard equally, for and against. I'm not "angry" at all, I simply stated my informed opinion and am being accused of not having the knowledge to make a comment or bullying? Your harassment is bullying however and you should stop before you are blocked. Wildthing61476 02:06, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with all its kin Tom Harrison ^Talk 02:12, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Flagrant violation of WP:VAIN. --physicq210 02:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
'Delete per nom. --ZimZalaBim (talk) 02:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and Zoe. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 02:31, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Michael Kinyon 09:32, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.