Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automation Records
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete per criterion A7. No assertion of notability, and the off chance that this is just a joke (it looks like each album was wordplay on a sex position). --Wafulz 02:34, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Automation Records (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-noteable label, none of it's artists have their own article either Lugnuts 14:47, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- delete - per this is exactly why notability was invented the_undertow talk 23:29, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sr13 (T|C) 18:48, 21 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 01:56, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as it is not notable. Acalamari 02:06, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.