Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Auxiliary power

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was revert to non-dab version. Anything further is an editorial matter.  Sandstein  21:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Auxiliary power (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a proper dab page, but a grab bag list of very loosely related articles. Clarityfiend (talk) 13:55, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 05:07, 30 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Revert to this version before it was merged to Emergency power system. I'm looking at the article that this information was merged into, and I'm not seeing much (if anything) resembles that. The concept of "auxiliary power" seems notable to me and it's different from any of the suggestions presented in the "disambiguation." It could definitely use some come clean-up, but that version is a good start. -- Tavix (talk) 15:26, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Revert to this version per Tavix. Otherwise, redirect to Emergency power system. The DAB is clearly inappropriate, and I lean towards two articles for emergency and auxiliary power (as I understand it, emergency power is ideally never used, while auxiliary power can be used for maintenance or other regular operations). Tigraan (talk) 15:17, 3 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.