Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avalance Global solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. After three relists and a lack of discussion, a consensus cannot be determined. (non-admin closure) — Music1201 ^talk 15:55, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Avalance Global solutions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BOMBARDment aside, no indication this meets WP:CORP.

This appears to be part of a larger spamming/PR effort. The article was previously deleted at Avalance, where this should be moved, if it survives. There's also a draft at Draft:Avalance

The company's founder also has an article which has been repeatedly recreated/deleted. See Manan Shah (Ethical Hacker) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Manan Shah (Ethical Hacker) Grayfell (talk) 21:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 07:45, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. GSS (talk) 07:45, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Krishtailor (talk) 11:45, 27 June 2016 (UTC) all articles are genuine and which content like you an advertisement please tell me...and how can i remove this notice.[reply]

Delete I went through the 37 references and removed the ones that were primary sources, trivial directory listings, unreliable. Most of the remaining 14 are in Gujarati so I cannot read them but I doubt they are any better than the ones I removed. I doubt there is a single reliable independent source. Fails WP:CORP. Delete this and any other variants that may appear. Except for the author, this deletion should be completely uncontroversial. MB (talk) 05:38, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: I started a sock-puppet investigation which includes both articles' creators: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nxtgenwiki. Grayfell (talk) 02:54, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:03, 3 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:45, 11 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist — Music1201 ^talk 01:48, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201 ^talk 01:48, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.