Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avaya VSP-7000 System

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. ^{Let's talk}_{about my edits?} 13:45, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Avaya VSP-7000 System

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

~~Delete~~. Non-notable product. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 18:55, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note – This statement above is part of the nomination itself, and not an !vote. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:31, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The above not a !vote and Alan Liefting is a retired account. - Geek2003 (talk) 08:24, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The references are sufficient to suggest notability. Alessandra Napolitano (talk) 23:32, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:47, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Added history and references for notability, also this is a new page that needs to be expanded. - Geek2003 (talk) 03:17, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NEVENT and WP:NOTDIR. (Same argument as for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avaya ERS-5600 Systems) The product's introduction itself is hardly notable, and none of these secondary sources go beyond its introduction and announcement. There are thousands of hardware models which receive cursory, descriptive published coverage when they're launched. WP:GNG establishes a presumption, not a guarantee that a subject is suitable for inclusion. While these lists of features and press releases satisfy WP:V, that's not enough: this is not a catalog or directory. Some products like Cisco PIX or Nortel Meridian lend themselves to encyclopedic coverage because they're technically or historically important. Has anything interesting actually been said about this series of stackable switches which goes beyond simple description or press-release content? If not, it belongs in a list. – Pnm (talk) 17:30, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Several articles and equipment reviews are now listed. - Geek2003 (talk) 17:06, 21 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - T P 22:02, 20 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, BusterD (talk) 01:51, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep – Per coverage and reviews in reputable sources: ZD Net (CBS Interactive), Network World, Tech World, IT Channel Planet. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:39, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Sufficient coverage for this computer hardware. --DThomsen8 (talk) 16:11, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Coverage has been found and proves the hardware is notable. Dream Focus 15:11, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In 20 seconds of Googling I found the Tech World review, went to add it as a reference, then realised sources had probably been added since the Afd opened. --Ritchie333 (talk) 10:26, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.