- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Stifle (talk) 15:36, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- AxCrypt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Declined A7 speedy deletion nominee. The article makes no assertion of notability whatsoever, but falls outside the A7 specification. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:18, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: mere inclusion of a technology in the Microsoft Windows OS does not merit WP:Notability. There are probably hundreds of such products that have come and gone in such fashion. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 23:32, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:02, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This isn't even included in the Windows OS. It integrates into Windows Explorer once it is installed by the user, which is something totally different and rather trivial. Notability lacking, etc. Zetawoof(ζ) 01:01, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete non-notable. FaerieInGrey (talk) 03:51, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - non-notable] software. Per Zetawoof it isn't actually included with Windows, but once installed it integrates into Windows Explorer. Matt (Talk) 09:31, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 09:38, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.