- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. No apparent notability. Black Kite 18:31, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Axel Leimer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
No reliable third-party coverage of any significance. The article is just a resume and serves little purpose other than the glorification of the subject. Pichpich (talk) 06:34, 11 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete There is no reliable third-party coverage of this individual that I can find after checking Google News, Google Scholar and Google Books. Based on this, I do not believe the subject has met notability requirements. (Mind meal (talk) 07:38, 11 February 2008 (UTC))[reply]
- Keep He seems to be an inportant and prominant chemist.Johnpacklambert (talk) 04:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Seems to be? I can't find any source to back up that claim. You'd expect that an important, prominent chemist would have a PhD and/or a long list of peer-reviewed publications. Pichpich (talk) 15:24, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.